RAS BiologyЭкология Ecology

  • ISSN (Print) 0367-0597
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-6142

ASSESSMENT OF COPPER TOXICITY TO SUNFLOWER UNDER MONOMETALLIC SOIL CONTAMINATION CONDITIONS

PII
S3034614225060023-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034614225060023
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 6
Pages
429-436
Abstract
Ecotoxicological studies on metal toxicity are commonly conducted using artificially contaminated soils, whereas investigations of naturally or industrially contaminated soils remain limited. Industrially contaminated soils often contain elevated concentrations of multiple elements, complicating the interpretation of toxic effects. This underscores the exceptional value of sites with monometallic pollution. One such site is the Kargaly copper mining district in the Orenburg Region of the Russian Federation. This study assessed copper phytotoxicity to sunflower ( L.) grown under field conditions in soils historically contaminated by copper mining during the 18–19 centuries. Total copper content in the studied soils reached up to 10,000 mg/kg, while the content of other elements remained close to the background levels, confirming the monometallic nature of the pollution. The effective concentrations of copper causing 25% and 50% reductions (EC and EC) in sunflower shoot growth were 9.8 and 12 mg/kg, respectively. Corresponding EC and EC values for total soil copper were 706 and 929 mg/kg, respectively.
Keywords
тяжелые металлы экотоксичность биодоступность
Date of publication
15.10.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
38

References

  1. 1.  Vorobeichik E.L., Kozlov M.V. Impact of point polluters on terrestrial ecosystems: Methodology of research, experimental design, and typical errors // Russ. J. Ecol. 2012. V. 43. № 2. P. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1067413612020166
  2. 2.  Koptsik S.V., Koptsik G.N. Assessment of current risks of excessive heavy metal accumulation in soils based on the concept of critical loads: A review // Eurasian Soil Science. 2022. V. 55. № 5. P. 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064229322050039
  3. 3.  Minkina T.M., Motuzova G.V., Mandzhieva S.S., Nazarenko O.G. Ecological resistance of the soil-plant system to contamination by heavy metals // J. Geochem. Explor. 2012. V. 123. P. 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.08.021
  4. 4.  Adriano D.C. Trace elements in terrestrial environments: Biogeochemistry, bioavailability, and risk of metals. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001. 867 p.
  5. 5.  Duffus J.H. “Heavy metals” a meaningless term? (IUPAC Technical Report) // Pure Appl. Chem. 2002. V. 74. P. 793–807. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200274050793
  6. 6.  Hodson M.E. Heavy metals – geochemical bogey men? // Environ Pollut. 2004. V. 129. № 3. P. 341–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2003.11.003
  7. 7.  Neaman A. Soil metals // Idesia (Chile). 2022. V. 40. № 2. P. 2–6. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292022000200002
  8. 8.  Santa-Cruz J., Peñaloza P., Korneykova M.V., Neaman A. Thresholds of metal and metalloid toxicity in field-collected anthropogenically contaminated soils: A review // Geogr. Environ. Sustain. 2021. V. 14. № 2. P. 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2021-023
  9. 9.  Zhikharev A.P., Sahakyan L., Tepanosyan G. et al. Metal phytotoxicity thresholds in copper smelter-contaminated soils // Idesia (Chile). 2022. V. 40. № 3. P. 135–143. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292022000300135
  10. 10.  Wieser P.E., Jenner F.E. Chalcophile elements: Systematics and relevance // Encyclopedia of Geology (Second Edition) / Eds. Alderton D., Elias S.A. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2021. P. 67–80.
  11. 11.  Vorobeichik E.L. Natural recovery of terrestrial ecosystems after the cessation of industrial pollution: 1. A state-of-the-art review // Russ. J. Ecol. 2022. V. 53. № 1. P. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1067413622010118
  12. 12.  Neaman A., Tapia-Pizarro F., Kozlova E.V. et al. Comparative sensitivity of earthworms and microorganisms as bioindicators of copper toxicity in a monometallic contamination site // Int. J. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2025. V. 52. № 2. P. 79–91. https://doi.org/10.7764/ijanr.v52i2.90774
  13. 13.  Tapia-Pizarro F., Dovletyarova E.A., Gunko A.A. et al. The effect of laboratory testing duration on copper phytotoxicity in industrially polluted soils // Biol. Bull. 2025. V. 52. P. 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359025612273
  14. 14.  Gunko A.A. The exploration of the old copper mines of XVII–XIX centuries in Tatarstan // Peshchery (Caves). 2008. V. 31. P. 74–89.
  15. 15.  Gunko A. Research prospects of old mine workings in the Ural mountains // Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Speleology. Czech Republic, Brno, 2013. P. 213–216.
  16. 16.  Dovletyarova E.A., Zhikharev A.P., Polyakov D.G. et al. Extremely high soil copper content, yet low phytotoxicity: A unique case of monometallic soil pollution at Kargaly, Russia // Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2023. V. 42. № 3. P. 707–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5562
  17. 17.  Dovletyarova E.A., Zhikharev A.P., Polyakov D.G. et al. Copper phytotoxicity thresholds for sunflower: A field experiment at a site with unique monometallic soil contamination // Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2024. V. 71. Art. 224. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443724608735
  18. 18.  Garcia J.M.V., Navarrete M.I.M., Saez J.A.L., Morencos I.D. Environmental impact of copper mining and metallurgy during the Bronze Age at Kargaly (Orenburg region, Russia) // Trabajos de Prehistoria. 2010. V. 67. № 2. P. 511–544. https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.2010.10054
  19. 19.  Marschner H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press, 2003.
  20. 20.  Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service, 2022. 410 p.
  21. 21.  Khitrov N.B., Gerasimova M.I. Diagnostic horizons in the classification system of Russian soils: Version 2021 // Eurasian Soil Science. 2021. V. 54. № 8. P. 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1064229321080093
  22. 22.  Selles I., Neaman A., Krutyakov Y.A., Ginocchio R. Rising copper exposure effects on nutrient uptake in two species with distinct copper tolerance // Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2021. V. 68. № 2. P. 300–306. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443721020175
  23. 23.  Sauvé S., Hendershot W., Allen H. Solid-solution partitioning of metals in contaminated soils: Dependence on pH, total metal burden, and organic matter // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000. V. 34. P. 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9907764
  24. 24.  Ball J.W., Nordstrom D.K. User’s manual for WATEQ4F, with revised thermodynamic data base and text cases for calculating speciation of major, trace, and redox elements in natural waters. Menlo Park, CA, USA: US Geological Survey, 1991. 189 p.
  25. 25.  Verdejo J., Ginocchio R., Sauvé S. et al. Thresholds of copper phytotoxicity in field-collected agricultural soils exposed to copper mining activities in Chile // Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015. V. 122. P. 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.07.026
  26. 26.  Verdejo J., Ginocchio R., Sauvé S. et al. Thresholds of copper toxicity to lettuce in field-collected agricultural soils exposed to copper mining activities in Chile // J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016. V. 16. P. 154–158. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162016005000011
  27. 27.  Mondaca P., Catrin J., Verdejo J. et al. Advances on the determination of thresholds of Cu phytotoxicity in field-contaminated soils in central Chile // Environ Pollut. 2017. V. 223. P. 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.076
  28. 28.  Marschner H. Zinc uptake from soils // Zinc in Soils and Plants / Eds. Robson A.D. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993. P. 59–77.
  29. 29.  Prudnikova E.V., Neaman A., Terekhova V.A. et al. Root elongation method for the quality assessment of metal-polluted soils: Whole soil or soil-water extract? // J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020. V. 20. P. 2294–2303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00295-x
  30. 30.  Peñaloza P., Valdebenito S., Vidal K. et al. Decoding phytotoxicity: the predictive power of total soil copper content in long-term pepper growth in copper-polluted soils // Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2024. V. 71. Art. 127. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443724604853
  31. 31.  Lillo-Robles F., Tapia-Gatica J., Díaz-Siefer P. et al. Which soil Cu pool governs phytotoxicity in field-collected soils contaminated by copper smelting activities in central Chile? // Chemosphere. 2020. V. 242. Art. 125176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125176
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library