Библиография

1. 1.  Díaz S., Settele J., Brondízio E.S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change // Science. 2019. V. 366. Art. 3100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100
2. 2.  Hendrix P.F., Callaham M.A., Drake J.M. et al. Pandora’s box contained bait: the global problem of introduced earthworms // Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008. V. 39. P. 593–613. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173426
3. 3.  Frelich L.E., Blossey B., Cameron E.K. et al. Side-swiped: ecological cascades emanating from earthworm invasions // Front. Ecol. Environ. 2019. V. 17. P. 502–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2099
4. 4.  Ferlian O., Thakur M.P., Gonzalez A. et al. Soil chemistry turned upside down: A meta-analysis of invasive earthworm effects on soil chemical properties // Ecology. 2020. V. 101. Art. e02936. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2936
5. 5.  Richardson J.B., Johnston M.R., Herrick B.M. Invasive earthworms Amynthas tokioensis and Amynthas agrestis alter macronutrients (Ca, Mg, K, P) in field and laboratory forest soils // Pedobiologia. 2022. V. 91–92. Art. 150804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2022.150804
6. 6.  Van Groenigen J., Lubbers I., Vos H. et al. Earthworms increase plant production: a meta-analysis // Sci. Rep. 2014. V. 4. Art. 6365. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06365
7. 7.  Lang B., Betancur-Corredor B., Russell D.J. Earthworms increase mineral soil nitrogen content – a meta-analysis // Soil Organisms. 2023. V. 95. P. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25674/so95iss1id308
8. 8.  Eisenhauer N., Partsch S., Parkinson D., Scheu S. Invasion of a deciduous forest by earthworms: Changes in soil chemistry, microflora, microarthropods and vegetation // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007. V. 39. P. 1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.12.019
9. 9.  Hodson M.E., Brailey-Jones P., Burn W.L. et al. Enhanced plant growth in the presence of earthworms correlates with changes in soil microbiota but not nutrient availability // Geoderma. 2023. V. 433. Art. 116426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116426
10. 10.  Hemkemeyer M., Schwalb S.A., Heinze S. et al. Functions of elements in soil microorganisms // Microbiol. Res. 2021. V. 252. Art. 126832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2021.126832
11. 11.  Jamroz E., Bekier J., Medynska-Juraszek A. et al. The contribution of water extractable forms of plant nutrients to evaluate MSW compost maturity: a case study // Sci. Rep. 2020. V. 10. Art. 12842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69860-9
12. 12.  Бабий К.А., Князев С.Ю., Соломатин Д.В., Голованова Е.В. Влияние инвазивного дождевого червя Eisenia nana (Lumbricidae) на содержание водорастворимых форм катионов (NH4+, K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+) в почве // Экология. 2023. № 4. С. 302–310
13. 13. Babiy K.A., Kniazev S.Y., Solomatin D., Golovanova E.V. Influence of the Invasive Earthworm Eisenia nana (Lumbricidae) on the Content of Water-Soluble Forms of Cations (NH4+, K+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+) in Soil // Russ. J. of Ecology. 2023. V. 54. P. 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413623040033
14. 14.  Resner K., Yoo K., Sebestyen S.D. et al. Invasive earthworms deplete key soil inorganic nutrients (Ca, Mg, K, and P) in a northern hardwood forest // Ecosystems. 2015. V. 18. P. 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-014-9814-0
15. 15.  Felten D., Emmerling C. Earthworm burrowing behaviour in 2D terraria with single- and multi-species assemblages // Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2009. V. 45. P. 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0393-8
16. 16.  Le Couteulx A., Wolf C., Hallaire V., Peres G. Burrowing and casting activities of three endogeic earthworm species affected by organic matter location // Pedobiologia. 2015. V. 58. P. 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2015.04.004
17. 17.  Bottinelli N., Jouquet P., Minh T. et al. Mid-infrared spectroscopy to trace biogeochemical changes of earthworm casts during ageing under field conditions // Geoderma. 2021. V. 383. Art. 114891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114811
18. 18.  Tiunov A.V., Hale C.M., Holdsworth H.M., Vsevolodova-Perel T.S. Invasion patterns of Lumbricidae into the previously earthworm-free areas of northeastern Europe and the western Great Lakes region of North America // Biol. Invasions. 2006. V. 8. P. 1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9018-4
19. 19.  Vsevolodova-Perel T.S., Leirikh A.N. Distribution and ecology of the earthworm Eisenia nordenskioldi pallida (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) dominant in southern Siberia and the Russian Far East // Entomol. Rev. 2014. V. 94. P. 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873814040034
20. 20.  Kniazev S.Y., Kislyi A.A., Bogomolova I.N., Golovanova E.V. Territorial heterogeneity of the earthworm population (Opisthopora, Lumbricidae) of Omsk oblast and environmental factors: A quantitative assessment of the relationship // Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2022. V. 15. P. 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425522050079
21. 21. IUSS Working Group WRB. World reference base for soil resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. 4th edition. International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS). Vienna, Austria, 2006. 236 p.
22. 22.  Lê S., Josse J., Husson F. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis // J. Stat. Software. 2008. V. 25. P. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01
23. 23.  Булыгина О.Н., Разуваев В.Н., Александрова Т.М. Описание массива данных суточной температуры воздуха и количества осадков на метеорологических станциях России и бывшего СССР (tttr). Свидетельство о государственной регистрации базы данных № 2014620942. URL: http://aisori-m.meteo.ru/waisori/select.xhtml (Дата обращения 04.07.2025)
24. 24.  Mudrák O., Frouz J. Earthworms increase plant biomass more in soil with no earthworm legacy than in earthworm-mediated soil, and favour late successional species in competition // Funct. Ecol. 2018. V. 32. P. 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12999
25. 25.  Babiy K.A., Kniazev S.Yu., Abramenko A.S., Golovanova E.V. The first data regarding the effect of the exotic Eisenia ventripapillata (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) on the cation composition of soils in Western Siberia // Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ. Biol. 2022. V. 60. P. 65–77. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988591/60/4
26. 26.  Medina-Sauza R.M., Álvarez-Jiménez M., Delhal A. et al. Earthworms building up soil microbiota, a review //Front. Environ. Sci. 2019. V. 7. Art. 81. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00081
27. 27.  Price-Christenson G.J., Johnston M.R., Herrick B.M., Yannarell A.C. Influence of invasive earthworms (Amynthas spp.) on Wisconsin forest soil microbial communities and soil chemistry // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020. V. 149. Art. 107955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107955
28. 28.  Marichal R., Martinez A.F., Praxedes C. et al. Invasion of Pontoscolex corethrurus (Glossoscolecidae, Oligochaeta) in landscapes of the Amazonian deforestation arc // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2010. V. 46. P. 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.09.001
29. 29.  Kim Y.-N., Robinson B., Boyer S. et al. Interactions of native and introduced earthworms with soils and plant rhizospheres in production landscapes of New Zealand // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2015. V. 96. P. 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2006.09.001
30. 30.  Pulleman M.M., Six J., Uyl A. et al. Earthworms and management affect organic matter incorporation and microaggregate formation in agriculture soils // Appl. Soil Ecol. 2005. V. 29. P. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.10.003
31. 31.  Babiy K.A., Kniazev S.Yu., Golovanova E.V. et al. What determines ion content of Lumbricid casts: soil type, species, or ecological group? // Pol. J. Ecol. 2021. V. 69. P. 96–110. https://doi.org/10.3161/15052249PJE2021.69.2.003
32. 32.  Le Mer G., Bottinelli N., Dignac M.F. et al. Exploring the control of earthworm cast macro- and micro-scale features on soil organic carbon mineralization across species and ecological categories // Geoderma. 2022. V. 427. Art. 116151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116151
33. 33.  Canti M.G., Piearce T.G. Morphology and dynamics of calcium carbonate granules produced by different earthworm species // Pedobiologia. 2003. V. 47. P. 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00221
34. 34.  Lee K., Foster R. Soil fauna and soil structure // Aust. J. of Soil Res. 1991. V. 29. P. 745–775. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9910745
35. 35.  Zorn M.I., Van Gestel C.A.M., Eijsackers H. The effect of two endogeic earthworm species on zinc distribution and availability in artificial soil columns // Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005. V. 37. P. 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.10.012
36. 36.  Capowiez Y., Gilbert F., Vallat A. et al. Depth distribution of soil organic matter and burrowing activity of earthworms – mesocosm study using X-ray tomography and luminophores // Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2021. V. 57. P. 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-020-01536-y
37. 37.  Pham Q.V., Nguyen T.T., Lam D.H. et al. Using morpho-anatomical traits to predict the effect of earthworms on soil water infiltration // Geoderma. 2023. V. 429. Art. 116245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116245